One looked it well in the face, I seem to remember,this extravagance; and with the effect precisely of recognising the charm of the problem. challenge any such problem with any intelligence, and you immediately see how full it is of substance; the wonder being, all the while, as we look at the world,how absolutely, how inordinately, the Isabel Archers,and even much smaller female fry, insist on mattering.George Eliot has admirably noted it—"In these frail vessels is borne onward through the ages the treasure of human affection." In "Romeo and Juliet"Juliet has to be important, just as, in "Adam Bede"and "The Mill on the Floss" and "Middlemarch" and"Daniel Deronda," Hetty Sorrel and Maggie Tulliver and Rosamond Vincy and Gwendolen Harleth have to be; with that much of firm ground, that much of bracing air, at the disposal all the while of their feet and their lungs. They are typical, none the less, of a class dif昀cult, in the individual case, to make a centre of interest; so difficult in fact that many an expert painter, as for instance Dickens and Walter Scott, as for instance even, in the main, so subtle a hand as that of R. L. Stevenson, has preferred to leave the task unattempted. There are in fact writers as to whom we make out that their refuge from this is to assume it to be not worth their attempting; by which pusillanimity in truth their honour is scantly saved. It is never an attestation of a value, or even of our imperfect sense of one, it is never a tribute to any truth at all, that we shall represent that value badly. It never makes up,artistically, for an artist＇s dim feeling about a thing that he shall "do" the thing as ill as possible. There are better ways than that, the best of all of which is to begin with less stupidity.